Escriba para buscar

Buscar Noticias es mi negocio

En resumen

Lawmakers investigate LUMA’s rejection of 1,800+ damage claims

The Puerto Rico House Consumer Affairs Committee held a hearing to probe LUMA Energy’s denials of claims for damaged appliances.

A House committee probes the Puerto Rico utility’s liability rules and consumer protections.

The Puerto Rico House Consumer Affairs Committee is investigating LUMA Energy’s rejection of 1,828 claims for household appliance damages, raising concerns about the utility’s liability policies and consumer protections.

At a May 27 hearing, Rebecca Maldonado, LUMA’s director of Stakeholder and Intervenor Affairs, confirmed no claims had been approved.

“The complaints we received cannot be paid according to the release of liability,” she said, explaining that compensation is only possible through insurance and for losses tied to physical injury or property damage caused by voltage fluctuations or service interruptions.

Rep. Pedro “Pellé” Santiago-Guzmán, who authored the resolution that launched the probe, criticized LUMA’s stance.

“This is something we could resolve administratively. We’re talking about pennies compared to millions,” he said.

Committee Chair Rep. Edgar Robles-Rivera questioned the company’s spending priorities, pointing to LUMA’s $4.5 million public relations budget.

“Do you think Juan Saca [LUMA’s president] could be empathetic enough to use part of that money to help the people?” he asked.

Independent Office for Consumer Protection (OIPC, in Spanish) Director Henna Rivera explained that the current liability language follows the framework of the former Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), which paid under $500,000 in similar claims over a decade. She added that the OIPC is barred from representing consumers filing damage claims.

Electricians’ College President Frances Berríos called for more transparency and reform, citing poor communication with claimants and the lack of a public complaint registry. She urged legislators to strengthen the OIPC’s regulatory authority.

Both the Department of Consumer Affairs (DACO, in Spanish) and the Ombudsman’s Office said they lack jurisdiction over such claims. DACO’s role is limited to matters involving solar panel installations, according to Secretary Valerie Rodríguez-Erazo.

Detalles del autor
Detalles del autor
Este contenido ha sido elaborado por el personal de News is my Business. Envíe sus preguntas, comentarios y sugerencias a [email protected].
Etiquetas:

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *.

¡Oh, oh! Parece que estás usando un bloqueador de anuncios.

Nuestro sitio web depende de los anuncios para ofrecer contenido gratuito y mantener nuestras operaciones. Al desactivar su bloqueador de anuncios, nos ayuda a seguir ofreciendo contenido valioso sin ningún costo para usted.

Agradecemos sinceramente su comprensión y apoyo. Gracias por considerar desactivar su bloqueador de anuncios para este sitio web.